What the Supreme Court’s Decision about Health Care Means to Us

by Diana Zuckerman, PhD, president of the National Research Center for Women & Families

The term “Obamacare” began as an insult but now it is the name almost everyone uses to describe the healthcare reform law. Earlier this year, some of Mitt Romney’s critics called it RomneyCare, because it was, after all, a descendent of the healthcare program that Mitt Romney developed for Massachusetts. (An excellent program that Romney now says he opposes.)

But let’s forget the politics and call it what it is: the health care law that survived the Supreme Court.

 I like it because:

1. Children up to age 26 can be added to an adult’s health insurance policy for the same price as younger children. (That part of the bill is already in place)

2. Insurance companies can no longer put limits or a lifetime “cap” on how much they will pay for your essential health benefits.

3. Insurance companies can’t cancel your insurance coverage because you get sick or make an honest mistake on your insurance application form.

4. Insurance companies cannot increase (by 10% or more) how much they charge you without justifying it first to your state or federal Rate Review program

5. Insurance must pay for screening tests such as mammograms, Pap smears, colonoscopies

6. Women can go to an OB/GYN without needing a referral.

7. And soon, people with health problems will be able to buy health insurance and be covered for illnesses they already had.

If implemented as it is supposed to be, the health law will reduce medical costs. Why? Because every year, thousands (perhaps millions) of people who don’t buy health insurance get sick or get hurt in accidents. Many of those people don’t have the money to pay their medical bills. We don’t live in a country where we like to see people dying of cancer or gunshot wounds or car accidents on the street, so we rush them to the hospital and provide medical care even if they don’t have health insurance.

But somebody has to pay those medical bills, and guess who does? It’s you and me and everyone else who goes to that same hospital and pays for care through insurance or our own money. We aren’t asked to donate or pay for medical care for total strangers, we just do it automatically without realizing it because our medical bills secretly include a proportion of the costs of those unpaid medical bills of the uninsured.

It’s like magic:

The fewer uninsured people who get medical care, the lower our healthcare bills will be. There are 2 solutions: We can lower those bills by 1) having fewer uninsured people or 2) by denying medical care to anyone who won’t pay.

Outside the Supreme Court, some Tea Party demonstrators said “I will NEVER buy health insurance and nobody can make me.” Perhaps we should just say to them: “OK, but please realize that if you or any uninsured family members need medical care because of illness or an accident – even an accident that is not your fault — you can’t expect anyone else to pay for your medical care. I’m sorry, but you or your loved one might die because you defended your right to NOT buy health insurance instead of taking advantage of your right to buy affordable health insurance.”

In truth, I would not want to have to say that, and I don’t think Americans would find that acceptable if asked. However, some hospitals do that quietly, by sending patients to other hospitals or back home when they are too ill to go home.

The Supreme Court upheld the law, but some states have done almost nothing to implement it. People in those states may end up with few options when they need health coverage. In contrast, states like California, Connecticut, and Maryland are going full speed ahead to implement the new law in ways that will provide essential health benefits to everyone, with a benchmark plan that is much better than what many Americans currently have.

I won’t be insulted if you want to call it Dianacare. I’d be proud to have it named after me, because I think the law is good for families across the country. Or perhaps we should call it USACare, because finally our government shows it cares by providing something almost every other country provides: affordable healthcare.

I’m tired of the angry politicians making ridiculous statements about government interference. If they want to abolish the health bill but want to keep Medicare, then they are hypocrites (or worse –perhaps they don’t actually understand Medicare.) Instead of listening to the political food fights, let’s just look at the health care that the law provides and think about how it might help you, a friend or neighbor, or an unemployed 55 year old who is too young for Medicare but too old to be able to get an affordable health insurance policy.

More info: StopCancerFun.org

The bottom line:

This law will end some of the worst insurance company practices that have unfairly hurt so many Americans. It will improve health care options for women, children, and people with pre-existing conditions or disabilities. (Perhaps this is why so many insurance companies and their lobbyists opposed it, through quiet contributions behind the scenes.) It will pay for cancer screening, prenatal care, and other prevention services that could save your life.

More Info: What’s Missing From the Healthcare Debate

That sounds pretty good, doesn’t it? Let’s think about it with an open mind.

 

2 Responses to What the Supreme Court’s Decision about Health Care Means to Us

  1. You do realize that not everyone has faith in western medicine, right? Some of us chose not to poison our bodies with chemicals made by big pharmaceutical companies – you know, the same ones who have made big ecological messes over the years like Agent Orange, and get people dependent on medications for their entire life, instead of making healthy choices to begin with. Being forced to purchase medical insurance that doesn’t even cover Naturpathic doctors and holistical medications might be good for some, but not for all of us. Yes, I could be walking down the street and get hit by a car – but it wouldn’t happen every year. In the meantime, I would be throwing away thousands of dollars for something I would not use otherwise. I am better off saving that money in the bank.

  2. People who are on Medicare have to pay premiums for it. And pay for the drug coverage, too. Many pay for supplemental insurance to cover what Medicare doesn’t. Seniors do not get free healthcare under Medicare, like some idiots claim. People who own a car, must buy car insurance. Most homeowners buy house insurance, and flood insurance if needed. Some of us buy Pet insurance, and many other types of insurance to save us money if there is a need. Why is there such a hub-bub over buying health insurance, if someone can afford it. Do people care more about their property then they do their health and lives??? It makes no sense to me. I prefer to have health insurance, even though paying for it leaves a lot less money for other things I need or want. Without health insurance, one serious illness can leave a person broke, and maybe in debt for the rest of their lives. Or worse!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>